Toward Praxis

Below, in all of its pathetic splendor, are the definitions and examples of anti-Semitism provided by the tax dollars of Brits. UK citizens are about 90 percent Honkie by 2001 stats. And by honkie, I mean white gentiles. Following below are the words of a report to the British Parliament on “anti-Semitism”. You will also find some of my commentary in bold. I trust that you will receive an education in true politically-correctness if you read to the end. Enjoy, as we Americans also prepare for the extension of the plantation to include these fields of pc-thought.  They already exists in Cananda and most European countries.   Read the rest of this entry »

MLB gets good grade in diversity hiring.

The grade is an A- even though black representation is down a few tenths of a percentage point, because blacks “just aren’t playing it at this point.” Efforts are still underway to get blacks out of inner-cities interested in baseball. A few questions: Why do you want more blacks playing if they are not interested? Why not let their parents turn them on to baseball? That’s how whites are introduced to baseball. Secondly, given the criminal stigma that is directly linked to black-representation (in sports and civilization), why would you encourage inviting more into your sport (Think of NBA and NFL)? The Jews who predominantly push for civil rights represent the ownership of many MLB clubs. They are learning that they can’t have their cake and eat it to. Also, the report fails to mention the growth of Hispanics in the sport. They are about 25 percent of MLB rosters (3 years ago and growing); thus more jobs are taken from whites than blacks. Racial-tension expert Lapchick had no comments on this.

Furthermore MLB received a C+ for gender hiring. Apparently we need more women wearing man-suits even though they cannot perform like men—the true leaders by nature and calling. In our idolatrous “scientific world” we ironically do not choose to venerate the statistics that show consistent IQ superiority of men over women, and consistent violent-crime superiority of blacks and Hispanics over whites.

Many “conservatives” today realize the phenomena of reverse-discrimination, but limit its victims to “the truly qualified.”  Sure, but the truly qualified almost always is the white man. The exceptions are the white men who are sissies and pagan.  Thus the enemy is the white, Christian, heterosexual dude.  Just watch the men on sitcoms, the news reporters.   Simply observe the university professors.  Or listen and watch many bought-pastors and self-desginated Christian leaders.  Even the ones that speak with boldness never call down women in the workplace, and probably think women “can do a good job in politics.” They watch too much TV and are proabably afraid of their “out-spoken” wives. They would get a A- too.

The use of B.C.E./C.E has always bothered me.  Actually the reasoning behind its use is what bothers me.  Here is the reasoning for using this “academic” and “scholarly” dating paradigm:

Most students will be accustomed to dating ancient events as either A.D. (which does not stand for “After Death,” but for “anno domini,” Latin for “year of our Lord”) or B.C. (”Before Christ”). This terminology may make sense for Christians, for whom A.D. 1996 [the first published date of the text] is indeed “the year of our Lord 1996.” It makes less sense, though, for Jews, Muslims, and others for whom Jesus is not the “Lord” or the Christ.” Scholars have therefore begun to use a different set of abbreviations as more inclusive of others outside the Christian tradition.  In this book I will follow the alternative designations of C.E. (”the Common Era,” meaning common to people of all faiths who utilize the traditional Western Calendar) and B.C.E.(”Before the Common Era”). In terms of the older abbreviations, then, C.E. corresponds to A.D. and B.C.E. to B.C. 

Bart Ehrman, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. Fourth Edition. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008) p.9

Do those who issue this rationale not realize that the fulcrum of either dating paradigm is the birth of Christ?  The scholars are but changing the names of the history markers, but keeping the immutable point at which history swings: namely the birth of the Lord of time and space.

So whether you are a Jew, Muslim, or a scholar, your birthday and all of history is measured in this ”inclusive” dating scheme by its relationship to the birth of the true Lord. Whether you acknowledge him or not is irrelevant. 

He is still Lord.

Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut is a good short-story dystopia that all should read.  It is relevant to our times as much as it was to any past time in which its theme was seemingly more material.  It would even be a good story to read as a group if you wanted to have discussion after a night of entertaining/dining your guests.

If you are interested in the relationship between conspiracy and truth, read it then read my thoughts below.  This will serve as a primer to my forthcoming post Conspiracy and Credibility.

********************************************

Read the rest of this entry »

Israel is a criminal, racist, anti-Christ state by the definitions of their own laws and religion.  Yes, all their Middle-Eastern neighbors hate them.  Yes, Israel has no muscular and cultural parity in the Middle-East.  Perhaps they would be doomed if the US didn’t give them 300 billion a year and their goyim/Christian military to destroy their stronger, more cultured, nations.  But they are sovereign.  They must be cut off.  They must fight their own wars which they started by stealing land from the Palestinians. 

And McCain needs to read the Talmud.  What a fool. As soon as the cameras shut down they must of bleached the prayer wall of his gentile filth.

Go here to see a piece and a video about McCain’s visit to Israel.  Notice the propaganda in the video of the Palestinian rockets the Jews are storing to show the abuse of the wicked Arabs. The article forgot to include these pictures of Israel’s bombs that mutilate Palestinians.  WARNING: GRAPHIC

For the first time ever, I may vote Democrat.  But perhaps I’m deluded.  After all, when all three major candidates sent their representatives to a Jewish brown-nosing meeting, it was Hilary’s rep who stated, “The role of the President of the United States is to support the decisions that are made by the people of Israel.” Why there was no objection from the others to this obvious conceptual departure to the President’s real role as laid out in the Constitution is why I might be wrong in voting Democrat.  But until Obama wears a yamaka, and parades in the Holy Land for Jewish sympathy he’s my man.  I can’t vote for a woman because I’m a Christian.  But the Christian voter might consider, given our unique circumstances, that this election should be about picking the guy who stands the best chance to start the revolution that can fix this nation.  How long will white Americans continue to foot the entitlement bills to those who are statistically the most anti-white group in America.  Interracial crime is virtually one way. How long will the heart of America take a President who puts the “black community” before sanity.  He will not disown his clearly anti-white pastor, but will demonize a man for saying that we would be better off with segregation.  Segregation to some equals “black hatred”, while to others it means eliminating nearly 40,000 black on white rapes per year.  But lower race-related physical crimes is not “better off”–lower race-related hate crimes is.  (Do you see the power of PC? It short-circuits critical thinking, and cancels the exploration of historical and logical perspective.)

America would not tolerate Obama, and that is why he will not win.  But candidates selected by true faith and sound reason are never the candidates who are allowed to win.

Good video.  Learn the origin of PC, and quit using it.

This is spot on. This is why we must learn to be critical thinkers. This is why we must turn the tube off and do our own research on current events, politics, etc.

These are Zionist euphemisms from another site.

Read the rest of this entry »

I think I may have posted the link to this some time ago. But its worth another look.

This is the best, concise treatment of the issue of Christ and Culture I have seen. In this exchange by Wilson and Horton, the reader will come accross every significant issue in the debate over whether there should/can be a Christian culture. Apart from the one who denies Christ’s concern for culture, everyone has a positon that is a variaton of either Wilson’s or Horton’s. But there is a wide gulf between these two sets of variations.

Wherever you lie on this issue, you should be able to deal with the crucial issues that come up in this exchange. Understand the thesis statements, as well as the stock support and objections for each. Then you will have done well.

You can then check back here for some commentary, which I hope will contribute to this debate in new ways. Until then, take 8 minutes to Tolle Lege.

***UPDATED AGAIN!***

**UPDATED**

Judge orders homeschoolers into government education

This next Presidency will be one of extreme Ammendment destruction. With the death of Habeus Corpus, we will now see the First and Second Ammendments gradually eroded. Stories like these are the bottom-line reality to remember in our discussions of Christ and Culture.

** Note To Parents: Let Schools Burn **

***Parents of 166,000 homeschooled students possibly subject to criminal charges.

Here’s the breakdown:

Homeschool parent: I don’t want my kids educated in State-run schools. I prefer to homeschool them.

State: ”That’s fine.  You may homeschool, so long as you get licensed.”

Conclusion: ”That’s not fine for you to homeschool.”

Recently President Bush condemned Israel as “neo-Nazi” for its policy on interracial marriages.  For a while the official state policy in Israel has been that it is illegal for a Jew to marry a non-Jew.  And this for good reasons.  According to the Talmud non-Jews are less than human. Perhaps Bush had finally read that:”Only Jews are human. [Gentiles] are animals” (Baba Mezia 114a-114b), or that “All [Gentile] children are animals (Yebamoth 98a). Or maybe he read some of the more grotesque references to us Gentiles–ones which I shall not repeat again.  Anyhow, the President made it clear that the billions of US dollars given in aid to Israel will discontinue until the Chosen State retracts its racist laws.

Of course, I’m kidding.  Bush would never criticize Israel, even though it is true that their laws on miscegenation cut across our multi-cultural spirit.  But in 2000 Bush did condemn Bob Jones University’s “racism” for the fact that they discouraged interracial dating.  This after many Jews castigated him for speaking there during his campaign. I’m glad he stopped short of making BJU his ally.  The Nuremberg laws of Nazi Germany also prohibited Germans (Gentiles) from mixing with Jews.  Can you imagine Bush calling Israel’s policy “Nazi”?

But nor can you imagine a less-than-consistent conclusion.

Why isn’t the media on this one? Didn’t they blast Ahmadinejad for the laws of his lands that don’t comport with our “liberated” laws?

Abre los ojos.

Excursus

If your wondering why Schindler’s List ended with the pitch, “Whoever saves one life saves the world entire,” there is an explanation.  Spielberg lied.  The quote is from Tractate Sanhedrin 37a: “Whosoever preserves a single soul of Israel, Scripture ascribes to him as if he had preserved a complete world.” That movie wouldn’t quite have the punch if it quoted the verse accurately.